Displayed is a newly described distal humerus fragment from the extinct species hom*o floresiensis. Researchers first excavated the fossil in 2013 at the site Mata Menge.
Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science newsletter.Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.
CNN —
A hobbit-size species of ancient human that lived on the Indonesian island of Flores until about 50,000 years ago baffles scientists in several ways.
First unearthed in a startling discovery nearly 21 years ago, hom*o floresiensis, the scientific name for the extinct species, challenged the idea that human evolution unfolded in a neat line from primitive to complex.
Experts don’t know why hom*o floresiensis — nicknamed the “hobbit” after J.R.R. Tolkien’s fictional characters — evolved such a tiny body yet lived relatively recently, how it crossed deep ocean to reach the island of Flores, exactly where to place this diminutive oddball on the human family tree, or why it disappeared.
An analysis of newly described hom*o floresiensis fossils published Tuesday in the journal Nature Communications attempts to answer some of these questions about the tiny human. The remains examined in the new study include a fragment of a humerus — the lower half of the upper arm bone — and two teeth discovered at a site known as Mata Menge, one of only two places on the island of Flores where fossils of the species have been found.
Pictured here is the Mata Menge excavation site circa 2014 on the Indonesian island of Flores
The study authors said their findings support an existing theory that the hobbits evolved their small size a long time ago and were most likely a dwarfed version of hom*o erectus, the first ancient human to leave Africa around 1.9 million years ago, with a body size and upright gait similar to present-day humans. The remains of hom*o erectus have been found on the Indonesian island of Java and elsewhere in Asia as well as Africa.
The researchers believe hom*o erectus became isolated on the island around 1 million years ago and underwent a dramatic reduction in body size during a period of around 300,000 years. Such a scaling down in size happens to other animals on remote islands in response to limited resources, the study noted.
“Perhaps, there was no need to be large-bodied, which requires more food and takes longer to grow and breed,” said lead study author Yousuke Kaifu, a professor at the University of Tokyo, via email. “The isolated island of Flores had no mammalian predators and other hominin species, so small-body size was OK.”
Based on the estimated length of the bone, the team calculated the height of its owner to be 100 centimeters (about 3.3 feet) tall. Teeth found at the same site, while smaller in size, bore a “high degree of similarity” to hom*o erectus teeth unearthed in Java.
Digital microscopy of the bone’s structure indicated it belonged to an adult, rather than a child. The complete humerus would have been 21.1 centimeters to 22 centimeters (8.3 inches to 8.7 inches) in length, the smallest human limb bone fossil ever found.
The sediment layer containing the fossils was dated in previous research to around 700,000 years ago.
New hom*o floresiensis revelations
This early hobbit was 6 centimeters (2.4 inches) shorter than the original hom*o floresiensis specimen, an almost complete skeleton found in the Liang Bua cave — around 75 kilometers (46.6 miles) west of Mata Menge in 2003 — and dated to around 60,000 years ago. Liang Bua cave is the only other place where hobbit fossils have been found.
The Mata Menge humerus fragment (left) is shown at the same scale as the humerus of hom*o floresiensis from Liang Bua.
The disparity in size between the two could point to natural variation, as seen within modern human populations, the authors noted. Overall, the research suggested that the hobbit species’ small size remained remarkably constant over a long period.
The newly analyzed finds, along with other teeth, a jawbone and skull fragment, unearthed at the same site and previously described, represent four hobbit individuals. Together with the more recent Liang Bua fossils, they suggest that the tiny humans were able to thrive on the island despite the presence of predators such as 3-meter-long (9.4-feet) Komodo dragons and crocodiles.
“The early dramatic reduction and subsequent stability of body size indicated that having a smaller body size on this isolated island was of benefit to the survival of these archaic humans,” the study authors said in a statement.
The hobbit, along with the subsequent discovery of two other small-bodied and small-brained hominins who lived relatively recently — hom*o naledi in South Africa and hom*o luzonensis in the Philippines — and the much larger Denisovans, has led to a wider acceptance among paleoanthropologists that there have been many diverse species of human, including several who coexisted with our own species, hom*o sapiens.
Before the discovery of hom*o floresiensis, many experts in human evolution thought essentially only one species of human had evolved through time, with regional variation.
The ‘hobbit’ origin story
Not all scientists agreed with the study’s interpretation that large-bodied hom*o erectus was the ancestor of hom*o floresiensis and that the hobbit represents a dwarfed version of hom*o erectus, said coauthor Gerrit van den Bergh, a senior lecturer at the Centre for Archaeological Science at the University of Wollongong in Australia.
With its tiny brain case and chimplike wristbones, the hobbit may be more closely related to small-bodied hominins such as hom*o habilis, only known from Africa, others have argued.
Matt Tocheri, Canada research chair in human origins at Lakehead University in Ontario, said he wasn’t convinced that the hobbit was a scaled-down hom*o erectus.
“I agree that their evidence indicates that small-bodied hominins were present on Flores at least 700,000 years ago. But why does that have to mean that their immediate ancestors that first arrived on the island were larger?” said Tocheri, who is also a research associate in the Smithsonian Institution’s Human Origins Program.
“I think this question remains unanswered and will continue to be a focus of research for some time to come.”
Van den Bergh said that the hobbit remains unearthed at Mata Menge were found between 2014 and 2016. However, the humerus was broken into fragments and not immediately recognized. One of the study authors painstakingly put it back together later.
“The fossils occur in hard sandstone,” van den Bergh said via email. “(W)e are forced to use metal chisels and hammers to break up the sediments, and therefore some of the fossils are recovered in many pieces.”
The humerus fragment was excavated at the Mata Menge site, shown here, in 2013. In the lower right corner a Stegodon tusk is visible.
To resolve the debate on the hobbit’s origins, hominin remains on Flores dating further back to the period when they arrived on the island, slightly more than 1 million years ago, would be needed, both van den Bergh and Tocheri said.
When the hobbit was first discovered, some experts in human evolution argued the bones were those of a modern human with a growth disorder — such as microcephaly, a condition that leads to an abnormally small head, a small body and some cognitive impairment. That assertion unleashed a fierce debate but has since largely been rejected.
No sign of disease was found in the humerus, according to the study.
“Every tiny fragment of hom*o floresiensis or any other hominin is incredibly important,” Tocheri said. “These fossils are our window to the shared evolutionary past of our species. Without them, we have no idea what was happening in the past.”
